Based on 31 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their UBCP positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 94% of 3.0Y peak
94% of all-time peak
31 funds currently hold this stock — 94% of the 3.0-year high of 33 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +19% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+5 new funds entered over the past year (+19% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 53% buying
16 buying14 selling
Last quarter: 16 funds bought or added vs 14 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~5 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 4 → 4 → 4 → 5. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
52% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 52% conviction (2yr+)
■ 35% medium
■ 13% new
16 out of 31 hedge funds have held UBCP for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~5 new funds/quarter
1 → 4 → 4 → 4 → 5 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 4 → 4 → 4 → 5. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 65% veterans vs 16% newcomers
■ 65% veterans
■ 19% 1-2yr
■ 16% new
Entry-cohort mix of 31 holders: 20 (65%) are 2+ year veterans, 6 entered 1–2 years ago, and 5 (16%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 25% AUM from major funds
25% from top-100 AUM funds
11 of 31 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 25% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 3.3/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.