Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

ARRAY DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE I COM (USM)

136 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in USM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -2
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
53%

Smart Money Signals — USM

Based on 143 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their USM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (95% of max)

95% of all-time peak
143 hedge funds hold USM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +7% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+9 new funds entered over the past year (+7% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 53% buying

81 buying71 selling
Last quarter: 81 funds bought or added vs 71 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-13 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 34 → 22 → 41 → 28. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

61% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 61% conviction (2yr+) ■ 18% medium ■ 21% new
87 out of 143 hedge funds have held USM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +2%, value -97%

Value
-97%
Shares
+2%
Last quarter: funds added +2% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -97%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

24 → 34 → 22 → 41 → 28 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 34 → 22 → 41 → 28. A growing number of institutions are discovering USM each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Deep conviction — 66% of holders stayed 2+ years

■ 66% veterans ■ 10% 1-2yr ■ 25% new
Of 146 current holders: 96 (66%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆

Elite ownership — 48% AUM from top-100 funds

48% from top-100 AUM funds
40 of 143 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 48% of total institutional value in USM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.4
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — USM

In 2025 Q4, 81 hedge funds were net buyers of USM (28 opened a new position, 53 added to an existing one), while 71 reduced or exited (41 trimmed, 30 sold completely) — a 53% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. 48% of total institutional value in USM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -2 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 143.

Hedge Fund Ownership: USM

How many hedge funds hold USM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of USM vs. share price

Market Analysis: USM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: USM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

26 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
6.2
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.7
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: USM
2026 Q1 Stats Unlock in 2 days 136 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in USM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2025 Q4) Prior (2025 Q3) Change
Funds Holding 136 141 -3.55%
13F Shares 18M 17M 2.06%
Total Value $946M $37.06B -97.45%
New Positions 25 39 -14
Increased Positions 54 49 +5
Closed Positions 29 28 +1
Reduced Positions 44 42 +2
Total Calls 3 3 -
Total Puts 3 4 -25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 1.33 Neutral

Statistics: USM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

136 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in USM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 institutional holders of USM — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Newtyn Management, LLC 7.97% 1,616,856 $74.6M
2 Potrero Capital Research LLC 4.54% 160,434 $7.4M
3 Tiptree Advisors, LLC 4.10% 153,115 $7.1M
4 Jericho Capital Asset Management L.P. 1.24% 1,815,844 $83.8M
5 KNIGHTSBRIDGE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC 0.81% 94,159 $5.0M
6 OAKTREE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP 0.53% 724,444 $33.4M
7 GAMCO INVESTORS, INC. ET AL 0.38% 844,562 $39.0M
8 Gem Investment Advisors, LLC 0.34% 7,439 $343K
9 DigitalBridge Group, Inc. 0.25% 87,550 $4.0M
10 GABELLI FUNDS LLC 0.17% 541,950 $25.0M
11 Central Pacific Bank - Trust Division 0.13% 21,900 $1.0M
12 BNP Paribas Asset Management Holding S.A. 0.11% 2,063,912 $95.2M
13 VARCOV Co. 0.09% 5,312 $245K
14 DARK FOREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP 0.08% 18,994 $876K
15 PRELUDE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 0.08% 21,500 $992K
16 INCEPTIONR LLC 0.07% 6,396 $295K
17 State of Alaska, Department of Revenue 0.05% 96,759 $4K
18 LOOMIS SAYLES & CO L P 0.05% 740,481 $34.2M
19 OCCUDO QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIES LP 0.04% 16,082 $799K
20 NAVELLIER & ASSOCIATES INC 0.04% 7,789 $359K
21 Hennion & Walsh Asset Management, Inc. 0.03% 21,201 $978K
22 Quantbot Technologies LP 0.03% 13,590 $627K
23 Aquatic Capital Management LLC 0.02% 16,667 $769K
24 Qube Research & Technologies Ltd 0.02% 401,943 $18.5M
25 Aberdeen Group plc 0.02% 257,000 $11.9M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — ARRAY DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE I COM (USM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for USM?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their USM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for USM?

Slight buying edge — 53% buying: Last quarter: 81 funds bought or added vs 71 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for USM holders?

Elite ownership — 48% AUM from top-100 funds: 40 of 143 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 48% of total institutional value in USM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held USM?

61% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 87 out of 143 hedge funds have held USM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.