Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Array Digital Infrastructure (USM)

135 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in USM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -8
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
46%

Smart Money Signals — USM

Based on 139 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their USM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 91% of 3.0Y peak

91% of all-time peak
139 funds currently hold this stock — 91% of the 3.0-year high of 153 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶

Steady growth — +5% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+7 new funds entered over the past year (+5% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction. The peak was reached in just 4 quarters from the low — a sharp move.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying

72 buying83 selling
Last quarter: 83 funds reduced or exited vs 72 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~31 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 41 → 28 → 33 → 31. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 55% conviction (2yr+) ■ 18% medium ■ 27% new
76 out of 139 hedge funds have held USM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -7%, value -27%

Value
-26%
Shares
-6%
Last quarter: funds added -7% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -27%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~31 new funds/quarter

22 → 41 → 28 → 33 → 31 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 41 → 28 → 33 → 31. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 62% veterans vs 30% newcomers

■ 62% veterans ■ 8% 1-2yr ■ 30% new
Entry-cohort mix of 144 holders: 90 (62%) are 2+ year veterans, 11 entered 1–2 years ago, and 43 (30%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 35% AUM from major funds

35% from top-100 AUM funds
32 of 135 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 35% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
3.5
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — USM

In 2026 Q2, 72 hedge funds were net buyers of USM (31 opened a new position, 41 added to an existing one), while 83 reduced or exited (44 trimmed, 39 sold completely) — a 46% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. 35% of total institutional value in USM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -8 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 139.

Hedge Fund Ownership: USM

How many hedge funds hold USM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of USM vs. share price

Market Analysis: USM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: USM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

9 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
4.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: USM
135 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in USM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 135 147 -8.16%
13F Shares 18M 20M -6.9%
Total Value $656M $896M -26.79%
New Positions 31 33 -2
Increased Positions 39 47 -8
Closed Positions 39 30 +9
Reduced Positions 43 39 +4
Total Calls 4 4 -
Total Puts 4 2 100.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.5 Neutral

Statistics: USM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

135 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in USM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 USM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Tiptree Advisors, LLC 4.55% 203,115 $7.4M
2 Newtyn Management, LLC 2.70% 597,090 $21.7M
3 Hawk Ridge Capital Management LP 2.11% 1,817,469 $65.9M
4 Madison Avenue Partners, LP 1.73% 1,109,463 $40.2M
5 Slotnik Capital, LLC 1.17% 125,253 $4.5M
6 Knightsbridge Asset Management, LLC 0.71% 94,159 $5.0M
7 Jericho Capital Asset Management L.P. 0.54% 1,815,844 $65.8M
8 Marble Bar Asset Management LLP 0.53% 21,127 $766K
9 Oaktree Capital Management LP 0.35% 696,858 $25.3M
10 Gamco Investors, INC. Et Al 0.27% 825,262 $29.9M
11 Viking Fund Management LLC 0.20% 62,800 $2.3M
12 Fieldview Capital Management, LLC 0.17% 16,284 $590K
13 Gem Investment Advisors, LLC 0.17% 7,439 $270K
14 Gabelli Funds LLC 0.13% 545,150 $19.8M
15 Central Pacific Bank - Trust Division 0.08% 21,900 $794K
16 Curated Wealth Partners LLC 0.07% 19,514 $505K
17 Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. 0.05% 86,793 $3.1M
18 Anchyra Partners LLC 0.05% 5,573 $202K
19 Dark Forest Capital Management LP 0.03% 14,834 $538K
20 Loomis Sayles & Co L P 0.03% 707,437 $25.7M
21 DigitalBridge Group, Inc. 0.03% 14,600 $529K
22 Navellier & Associates Inc 0.03% 11,002 $399K
23 Quantbot Technologies LP 0.03% 18,775 $681K
24 Hennion & Walsh Asset Management, Inc. 0.03% 24,919 $904K
25 Prelude Capital Management, LLC 0.02% 5,700 $207K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Array Digital Infrastructure (USM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for USM?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their USM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for USM?

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying: Last quarter: 83 funds reduced or exited vs 72 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for USM holders?

Strong quality — 35% AUM from major funds: 32 of 135 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 35% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held USM?

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 76 out of 139 hedge funds have held USM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →