Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Westwater Res Inc (WWR)

66 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in WWR. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -5
Streak
1Q ▼
Buyers last Q
46%

Smart Money Signals — WWR

Based on 66 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their WWR positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 93% of 3.0Y peak

93% of all-time peak
66 funds currently hold this stock — 93% of the 3.0-year high of 71 funds (reached 2026 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +38% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+18 new funds entered over the past year (+38% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying

27 buying32 selling
Last quarter: 32 funds reduced or exited vs 27 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~9 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 24 → 17 → 14 → 9. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

45% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 45% conviction (2yr+) ■ 23% medium ■ 32% new
30 out of 66 hedge funds have held WWR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -17%, value -37%

Value
-36%
Shares
-17%
Last quarter: funds added -17% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -37%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
⚠️

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

5 → 24 → 17 → 14 → 9 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 24 → 17 → 14 → 9. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 56% veterans vs 39% newcomers

■ 56% veterans ■ 6% 1-2yr ■ 39% new
Entry-cohort mix of 70 holders: 39 (56%) are 2+ year veterans, 4 entered 1–2 years ago, and 27 (39%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 36% AUM from major funds

36% from top-100 AUM funds
15 of 66 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 36% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — WWR

In 2026 Q2, 27 hedge funds were net buyers of WWR (9 opened a new position, 18 added to an existing one), while 32 reduced or exited (18 trimmed, 14 sold completely) — a 46% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. 36% of total institutional value in WWR is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -5 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 66.

Hedge Fund Ownership: WWR

How many hedge funds hold WWR — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of WWR vs. share price

Market Analysis: WWR

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: WWR

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

6 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
3.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: WWR
66 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in WWR. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 66 71 -7.04%
13F Shares 16M 19M -17.41%
Total Value $7M $11M -36.82%
New Positions 9 14 -5
Increased Positions 16 16 -
Closed Positions 14 9 +5
Reduced Positions 18 20 -2
Total Calls 2 3 -33.33%
Total Puts 2 2 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.67 Neutral

Statistics: WWR

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

66 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in WWR. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 WWR holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Pilgrim Partners Asia Pte Ltd 0.03% 116,600 $59K
2 Evernest Financial Advisors, LLC 0.02% 160,000 $81K
3 Southern Financial Group, LLC 0.02% 116,504 $59K
4 Brooklands Fund Management Ltd 0.01% 35,300 $17K
5 Massar Capital Management, LP 0.01% 199,271 $101K
6 Fortitude Advisory Group L.L.C. 0.01% 27,699 $14K
7 M3 Advisory Group, LLC 0.00% 15,820 $8K
8 XTX Topco Ltd 0.00% 524,079 $265K
9 Two Sigma Securities, LLC 0.00% 32,366 $16K
10 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.00% 1,608,790 $812K
11 CRA Financial Services, LLC 0.00% 15,000 $8K
12 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.00% 75,000 $38K
13 Beaird Harris Wealth Management, LLC 0.00% 20,417 $10K
14 Welch Group, LLC 0.00% 30,479 $15K
15 Alps Advisors Inc 0.00% 203,532 $103K
16 Pinnacle Associates Ltd 0.00% 85,900 $43K
17 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.00% 794,846 $401K
18 Ausdal Financial Partners, Inc. 0.00% 14,000 $7K
19 Stephens Inc /Ar/ 0.00% 35,032 $18K
20 SBI Securities Co., Ltd. 0.00% 16,888 $9K
21 OpenArc Corporate Advisory, LLC 0.00% 29,500 $15K
22 Simplicity Wealth,LLC 0.00% 10,000 $5K
23 B. Metzler seel. Sohn & Co. AG 0.00% 37,000 $19K
24 Regions Financial Corp 0.00% 50,000 $25K
25 NorthCrest Asset Manangement, LLC 0.00% 12,128 $6K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Westwater Res Inc (WWR)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for WWR?

Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their WWR positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for WWR?

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying: Last quarter: 32 funds reduced or exited vs 27 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for WWR holders?

Strong quality — 36% AUM from major funds: 15 of 66 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 36% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held WWR?

45% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 30 out of 66 hedge funds have held WWR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →