Based on 19 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
19 hedge funds hold XTJA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding XTJA is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 44% buying
7 buying9 selling
Last quarter: 9 funds reduced or exited vs 7 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~4 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 3 → 3 → 4. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
42% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 42% conviction (2yr+)
■ 26% medium
■ 32% new
8 out of 19 hedge funds have held XTJA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~4 new funds/quarter
1 → 0 → 3 → 3 → 4 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 3 → 3 → 4. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 47% veterans vs 32% newcomers
■ 47% veterans
■ 21% 1-2yr
■ 32% new
Entry-cohort mix of 19 holders: 9 (47%) are 2+ year veterans, 4 entered 1–2 years ago, and 6 (32%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 5% AUM from top-100
5% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 19 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 5% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
4.3
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.3/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.