Based on 3 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 75% of 3.0Y peak
75% of all-time peak
3 funds currently hold this stock — 75% of the 3.0-year high of 4 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 25% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
1 fewer hedge funds hold ZLNDY compared to a year ago (-25% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 100% buying
3 buying0 selling
Last quarter: 3 funds were net buyers (0 opened a brand new position + 3 added to an existing one). Only 0 were sellers (0 trimmed + 0 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 0 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 33% long-term, 0% new
■ 33% conviction (2yr+)
■ 67% medium
■ 0% new
Of the 3 current holders: 1 (33%) held >2 years, 2 held 1–2 years, and 0 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💰
Value +75% but shares only +46% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +75%, but actual share count only changed +46%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
1 → 0 → 1 → 0 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 0 → 0. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 33% veterans, 33% new entrants
■ 33% veterans
■ 33% 1-2yr
■ 33% new
Of 3 current holders: 1 (33%) held 2+ years, 1 held 1–2 years, 1 (33%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
🏆
Elite ownership — 78% AUM from top-100 funds
78% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 3 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 78% of total institutional value in ZLNDY. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.