Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Zoom Communications Inc (ZM)

817 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ZM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +5
Streak
7Q ▲
Buyers last Q
49%

Smart Money Signals — ZM

Based on 826 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 7 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 7 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ZM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
826 hedge funds hold ZM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +17% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+117 new funds entered over the past year (+17% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 49% buying

419 buying434 selling
Last quarter: 434 funds reduced or exited vs 419 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-14 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 109 → 129 → 152 → 138. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 53% conviction (2yr+) ■ 22% medium ■ 25% new
437 out of 826 hedge funds have held ZM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

103 → 109 → 129 → 152 → 138 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 109 → 129 → 152 → 138. A growing number of institutions are discovering ZM each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 61% veterans vs 27% newcomers

■ 61% veterans ■ 12% 1-2yr ■ 27% new
Entry-cohort mix of 878 holders: 534 (61%) are 2+ year veterans, 103 entered 1–2 years ago, and 241 (27%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds

55% from top-100 AUM funds
67 of 818 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in ZM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ZM

In 2026 Q1, 419 hedge funds were net buyers of ZM (138 opened a new position, 281 added to an existing one), while 434 reduced or exited (301 trimmed, 133 sold completely) — a 49% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. This marks 7 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 55% of total institutional value in ZM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +5 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 826.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ZM

How many hedge funds hold ZM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ZM vs. share price

Market Analysis: ZM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ZM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Broad Consensus, Selective Conviction

Many quality funds hold this stock, but top-tier positions remain relatively small.

46 top-rated funds 4 high-conviction
Consensus
7.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
4.1
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ZM
2026 Q2 Stats Unlock in 2 days 817 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ZM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 817 821 -0.49%
13F Shares 202M 217M -6.57%
Total Value $15.22B $18.62B -18.25%
New Positions 138 152 -14
Increased Positions 272 318 -46
Closed Positions 134 75 +59
Reduced Positions 286 224 +62
Total Calls 35 35 -
Total Puts 25 31 -19.35%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.71 0.89 Neutral

Statistics: ZM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

817 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ZM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
2026 Q2 filings are still coming in. Only funds that have filed so far are shown — top holders may not have reported yet. Full 13F data typically settles by ~50 days after quarter-end.
Top 25 ZM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Avory & Company, LLC 10.18% 94,352 $8.1M
2 Sender Co & Partners, Inc. 4.21% 168,357 $14.5M
3 Northern Right Capital Management, L.P. 4.02% 157,049 $13.6M
4 Comprehensive Financial Management LLC 3.32% 1,171,195 $101.1M
5 Cannon Global Investment Management, LLC 3.30% 13,500 $1.2M
6 Lane Generational LLC 2.71% 35,782 $3.1M
7 Seizert Capital Partners, LLC 2.38% 668,781 $57.7M
8 Rubric Capital Management LP 2.19% 2,766,009 $238.7M
9 Greenhaven Road Investment Management, L.P. 1.86% 33,141 $2.9M
10 Steamboat Capital Partners, LLC 1.85% 100,060 $8.6M
11 TB Alternative Assets Ltd. 1.67% 120,224 $10.4M
12 Ahara Advisors LLC 1.63% 13,869 $2.4M
13 Archon Capital Management LLC 1.58% 45,000 $3.9M
14 Hudson Capital Management LLC 1.48% 70,807 $6.1M
15 BlueCrest Capital Management Ltd 1.45% 508,925 $43.9M
16 Silver Lake Advisory, LLC 1.41% 45,590 $3.9M
17 Benchstone Capital Management LP 1.34% 128,552 $11.1M
18 Ardsley Advisory Partners LP 1.30% 145,000 $12.5M
19 Collar Capital Management, LLC 1.04% 20,350 $1.8M
20 Ardmore Road Asset Management LP 1.01% 200,000 $17.3M
21 Nano Cap New Millennium Growth Fund L P 1.00% 15,000 $1.3M
22 KR Capital LP 0.99% 116,158 $10.0M
23 Basepoint Wealth LLC 0.96% 19,393 $1.7M
24 Altshuler Shaham Ltd 0.92% 861,615 $74.4M
25 Klein Pavlis & Peasley Financial, INC. 0.88% 19,605 $1.7M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Zoom Communications Inc (ZM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ZM?

Buying streak — 7 quarters in a row: For 7 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ZM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ZM?

More sellers than buyers — 49% buying: Last quarter: 434 funds reduced or exited vs 419 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for ZM holders?

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds: 67 of 818 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in ZM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ZM?

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 437 out of 826 hedge funds have held ZM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →