Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Chargepoint Holdings Inc (CHPT)

159 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in CHPT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +16
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
61%

Smart Money Signals — CHPT

Based on 164 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CHPT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻

Below peak — only 47% of 3.0Y high

47% of all-time peak
Only 164 funds hold CHPT today versus a peak of 352 funds at 2023 Q4 — just 47% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉

Outflows — 32% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
78 fewer hedge funds hold CHPT compared to a year ago (-32% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

83 buying53 selling
Last quarter: 83 funds were net buyers (40 opened a brand new position + 43 added to an existing one). Only 53 were sellers (29 trimmed + 24 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+12 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new CHPT position: 30 → 26 → 28 → 40. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 54% conviction (2yr+) ■ 25% medium ■ 21% new
89 out of 164 hedge funds have held CHPT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +88% but shares only +61% — price-driven

Value
+88%
Shares
+61%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +88%, but actual share count only changed +61%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

38 → 30 → 26 → 28 → 40 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 30 → 26 → 28 → 40. A growing number of institutions are discovering CHPT each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 66% veterans vs 21% newcomers

■ 66% veterans ■ 12% 1-2yr ■ 21% new
Entry-cohort mix of 173 holders: 115 (66%) are 2+ year veterans, 21 entered 1–2 years ago, and 37 (21%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 59% AUM from top-100 funds

59% from top-100 AUM funds
34 of 159 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 59% of total institutional value in CHPT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
1.0
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 1.0/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — CHPT

In 2026 Q2, 83 hedge funds were net buyers of CHPT (40 opened a new position, 43 added to an existing one), while 53 reduced or exited (29 trimmed, 24 sold completely) — a 61% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 59% of total institutional value in CHPT is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +16 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 164.

Hedge Fund Ownership: CHPT

How many hedge funds hold CHPT — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of CHPT vs. share price

Market Analysis: CHPT

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: CHPT

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

9 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.1
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: CHPT
159 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in CHPT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 159 148 7.43%
13F Shares 9M 6M 61.04%
Total Value $51M $27M 88.13%
New Positions 40 28 +12
Increased Positions 41 25 +16
Closed Positions 24 21 +3
Reduced Positions 27 36 -9
Total Calls 7 4 75.0%
Total Puts 7 7 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 1.75 Neutral

Statistics: CHPT

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

159 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in CHPT. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 CHPT holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Crawford Fund Management, LLC 0.18% 198,500 $1.2M
2 Alamea Verwaltungs GmbH 0.17% 36,116 $213K
3 Sullivan Wood Capital Management LLC 0.14% 17,500 $103K
4 nVerses Capital, LLC 0.14% 14,950 $88K
5 Hamilton Capital Partners, LLC 0.07% 38,710 $229K
6 Alpha Wealth Funds, LLC 0.06% 17,673 $106K
7 Occudo Quantitative Strategies LP 0.04% 129,416 $765K
8 Gmt Capital Corp 0.03% 101,290 $599K
9 Pilgrim Partners Asia Pte Ltd 0.03% 11,600 $69K
10 Firsthand Capital Management, Inc. 0.03% 3,000 $18K
11 Aigen Investment Management, LP 0.02% 15,066 $89K
12 Cinctive Capital Management LP 0.02% 75,000 $443K
13 XTX Topco Ltd 0.00% 55,258 $327K
14 Verition Fund Management LLC 0.00% 131,700 $778K
15 IQ EQ FUND MANAGEMENT (IRELAND) Ltd 0.00% 10,397 $61K
16 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.00% 35,000 $207K
17 Susquehanna Portfolio Strategies, LLC 0.00% 33,202 $196K
18 Vision Retirement, LLC 0.00% 2,000 $12K
19 EFG International AG 0.00% 26,000 $154K
20 Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc 0.00% 107,781 $637K
21 NFSG Corp 0.00% 2,990 $18K
22 Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC 0.00% 17,266 $102K
23 Coatue Management LLC 0.00% 154,086 $911K
24 Ameriflex Group, INC. 0.00% 679 $4K
25 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.00% 181,159 $1.1M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Chargepoint Holdings Inc (CHPT)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for CHPT?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CHPT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for CHPT?

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying: Last quarter: 83 funds were net buyers (40 opened a brand new position + 43 added to an existing one). Only 53 were sellers (29 trimmed + 24 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for CHPT holders?

Elite ownership — 59% AUM from top-100 funds: 34 of 159 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 59% of total institutional value in CHPT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held CHPT?

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 89 out of 164 hedge funds have held CHPT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →