Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Goodyear Tire & Rubr Co (GT)

371 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in GT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -14
Streak
2Q ▼
Buyers last Q
46%

Smart Money Signals — GT

Based on 375 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GT positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 93% of 3.0Y peak

93% of all-time peak
375 funds currently hold this stock — 93% of the 3.0-year high of 402 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 7% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
27 fewer hedge funds hold GT compared to a year ago (-7% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying

179 buying208 selling
Last quarter: 208 funds reduced or exited vs 179 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-10 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 57 → 73 → 63 → 53. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

72% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 72% conviction (2yr+) ■ 13% medium ■ 15% new
271 out of 375 hedge funds have held GT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~53 new funds/quarter

72 → 57 → 73 → 63 → 53 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 57 → 73 → 63 → 53. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 76% veterans vs 16% newcomers

■ 76% veterans ■ 8% 1-2yr ■ 16% new
Entry-cohort mix of 400 holders: 305 (76%) are 2+ year veterans, 33 entered 1–2 years ago, and 62 (16%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 66% AUM from top-100 funds

66% from top-100 AUM funds
52 of 371 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 66% of total institutional value in GT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.2
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — GT

In 2026 Q2, 179 hedge funds were net buyers of GT (53 opened a new position, 126 added to an existing one), while 208 reduced or exited (141 trimmed, 67 sold completely) — a 46% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. Net selling has persisted for two consecutive quarters. 66% of total institutional value in GT is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -14 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 375.

Hedge Fund Ownership: GT

How many hedge funds hold GT — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of GT vs. share price

Market Analysis: GT

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: GT

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

14 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
5.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.4
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: GT
371 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in GT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 371 389 -4.63%
13F Shares 275M 279M -1.31%
Total Value $1.77B $1.80B -1.62%
New Positions 53 63 -10
Increased Positions 120 142 -22
Closed Positions 67 69 -2
Reduced Positions 134 123 +11
Total Calls 16 14 14.29%
Total Puts 13 12 8.33%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.81 0.86 Neutral

Statistics: GT

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

371 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in GT. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 GT holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 LM Asset Management Inc. 5.93% 1,450,000 $9.6M
2 Sippican Capital Advisors 1.70% 421,755 $2.8M
3 Hedges Asset Management LLC 0.86% 198,000 $1.3M
4 Barnett & Company, Inc. 0.66% 135,640 $895K
5 KLCM Advisors, Inc. 0.66% 1,262,811 $8.3M
6 IPG Investment Advisors LLC 0.62% 651,295 $4.3M
7 Paloma Partners Management Co 0.61% 1,270,000 $8.4M
8 Ironwood Investment Management LLC 0.60% 263,000 $1.7M
9 Readystate Asset Management LP 0.56% 2,488,405 $16.4M
10 Unifi Asset Management LP 0.53% 89,128 $781K
11 4wealth Advisors, INC. 0.52% 101,387 $673K
12 Gendell Jeffrey L 0.39% 6,690,818 $44.2M
13 Sandler Capital Management 0.28% 86,900 $574K
14 Quinn Opportunity Partners LLC 0.28% 918,302 $6.1M
15 Guardian Investment Management 0.26% 60,300 $398K
16 Bayforest Capital Ltd 0.25% 41,192 $272K
17 Lombard Odier Asset Management (USA) Corp 0.21% 229,000 $1.5M
18 SummerHaven Investment Management, LLC 0.20% 57,217 $378K
19 Edgestream Partners, L.P. 0.20% 1,027,875 $6.8M
20 KLCM Advisors, Inc. 0.20% 386,000 $2.5M
21 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.19% 1,595,329 $10.5M
22 Dark Forest Capital Management LP 0.16% 386,718 $2.6M
23 HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC 0.16% 449,833 $3.0M
24 Appaloosa LP 0.13% 1,508,591 $10.0M
25 Quantbot Technologies LP 0.12% 475,087 $3.1M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Goodyear Tire & Rubr Co (GT)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for GT?

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their GT positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for GT?

More sellers than buyers — 46% buying: Last quarter: 208 funds reduced or exited vs 179 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for GT holders?

Elite ownership — 66% AUM from top-100 funds: 52 of 371 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 66% of total institutional value in GT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held GT?

72% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 271 out of 375 hedge funds have held GT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →