Based on 96 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 3 quarters in a row
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their KLTR positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 93% of 3.0Y peak
93% of all-time peak
96 funds currently hold this stock — 93% of the 3.0-year high of 103 funds (reached 2025 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 4% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
4 fewer hedge funds hold KLTR compared to a year ago (-4% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 47% buying
49 buying55 selling
Last quarter: 55 funds reduced or exited vs 49 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+6 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new KLTR position: 13 → 13 → 15 → 21. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
43% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 43% conviction (2yr+)
■ 26% medium
■ 31% new
41 out of 96 hedge funds have held KLTR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -3%, value -32%
Last quarter: funds added -3% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -32%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈
Growing discovery — still being found
25 → 13 → 13 → 15 → 21 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 13 → 13 → 15 → 21. A growing number of institutions are discovering KLTR each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 48% veterans vs 35% newcomers
■ 48% veterans
■ 16% 1-2yr
■ 35% new
Entry-cohort mix of 97 holders: 47 (48%) are 2+ year veterans, 16 entered 1–2 years ago, and 34 (35%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 21% AUM from major funds
21% from top-100 AUM funds
28 of 95 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 21% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.