Asset Manager

Boston Partners

Boston, MA SEC Registered Investment Advisor Institutional and High Net Worth CIK: 0001386060
13F Score ?
11
3Y · Top 10 · Mgr Wt
13F Score ?
11
7Y · Top 10 · Mgr Wt
S&P 500 ?
80
Benchmark
$95.47B
AUM
+2.35%
2026 Q1
+16.24%
1-Year Return
+13.57%
Top 10 Concentration
+12.41%
Turnover
-1.16%
AUM Change
Since 2007
First Filing
767
# of Holdings

Fund Overview

13F Filed: 2026-05-11

As of 2026 Q1, Boston Partners manages $95.47B in reported 13F assets , holds 767 positions with +13.57% top-10 concentration , and delivered a 1-year return of +16.24% on its disclosed equity portfolio. Filing 13F reports since 2007.

About

Investment Strategy

Analytics Summary

Risk Profile

Key Personnel

Joseph Feeney — Chief Executive Officer
Christopher Hart — Chief Investment Officer, Large Cap Value
Gregory Dulski — Portfolio Manager
Official 13F Filings — SEC EDGAR Key personnel and Fund Overview may contain mistakes

Activity Summary — 2026 Q1

Q1 2026 13F Filed: May 11, 2026

Top Buys

% $
Stock % Impact
+0.64%
+0.43%
+0.43%
+0.40%
+0.38%
+0.32%

Top Sells

% $
Stock % Impact
-0.58%
-0.49%
Sold All 😨 Was: 0.40% -0.41%
-0.36%
Sold All 😨 Was: 0.34% -0.34%
Sold All 😨 Was: 0.32% -0.32%

Top Holdings

2026 Q1
Stock %
2.17%
1.58%
1.48%
1.44%
1.30%
1.19%
View All Holdings

Activity Summary

Latest
Market Value $95.47B
AUM Change -1.16%
New Positions 106
Increased Positions 294
Closed Positions 92
Top 10 Concentration +13.57%
Portfolio Turnover +12.41%
Alt Turnover +12.99%

Sector Allocation Trends

Quarterly History
Free View: Last 10 Quarters. Subscribe to see full history

Holdings Analysis

Size: % of Portfolio Color: Last Full-Quarter Return No data
Free: 10 quarters

Positions Dynamics

Visualizing Top 20 holdings weight history over the last 10 quarters.

Portfolio Analytics — Latest

Boston Partners risk dashboard covering volatility, beta, value-at-risk, drawdowns, concentration, factor tilts, benchmark comparison, and stress testing for the latest disclosed portfolio.

Risk access
Building institutional risk profile...
Guru Intelligence Hub Pro
Real-time Analytics
High-Conviction Alpha
AAPL 92.4
NVDA 88.1
MSFT 74.3
Strategy Guardian
Style Drift 0.12
Sector Rotation 0.38

Tracking institutional benchmark deviation

Scenario Lab
2008 GFC -32.4%
Covid-19 -18.1%
2022 Bear -24.7%
Unlock the full Guru Intelligence Hub
Real conviction scores for every holding  ·  Strategy Guardian alerts  ·  Live Scenario Lab stress tests
Upgrade to Pro

Best Strategy vs. Benchmarks

AI Backtest: Auto-Optimizing...
Loading AI Backtest...
Don't be Fooled by Randomness
Access Alpha, Capture Ratios, and Batting Average calibrated for this specific strategy.
UPGRADE NOW
Nassim Taleb — author of Fooled by Randomness
Returns
--
Latest Quarter
--
1-Year Return
--
Ann. Return
Risk
--
Std Deviation
--
Max Drawdown
--
Beta vs SPY
Quality
--
Sharpe
--
Sortino
--
Win Rate
--
Payoff Ratio
Edge Metrics Last 10 quarters only
--
Alpha annualized
--
Up Capture
--
Down Capture

Strategy Backtester: Boston Partners

Replicate top holdings performance • Compare vs benchmarks • Optimize N

Find the best N! Test multiple portfolio sizes at once to discover the optimal configuration.

Risk insights! Identify periods when the fund lagged the benchmark – critical for timing entries.

⏱ Run Backtest

Liquid Glass Edition

0
Backtests Run
+127%
Avg. Return

👆 Click the button to launch tickers!

Don't Be Fooled by Randomness
Proven alpha spans cycles, not just 24 months. Unlock full history since 1999.
PRO ACCESS
Free Demo
Try the Backtester on Real Funds
Run full-history backtests on a curated 2-3 funds. See signal quality, drawdowns, and cycle behavior before you decide.
Underperformance Analysis — Top 10 Holdings vs SPY

Backtesting Boston Partners's top 10 holdings against SPY identified 63 underperformance periods. Worst drawdown: 2020-01 – 2020-03 (-16.6% vs SPY, 3 quarters).

Avg. lag: -4.1% vs SPY Avg. duration: 2.1 quarters
Backtest Snapshot — Top 10 Holdings (Mn-Weighted)

The ticker-level breakdown shows how each of Boston Partners's top holdings contributed to portfolio returns quarter by quarter. Strongest recent contributors inside the last 5 years of the quarterly Top 10 backtest window: JPM (2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4, +11.2 pts), AZO (2021 Q2 – 2025 Q3, +10.6 pts), COP (2021 Q2 – 2022 Q3, +7.8 pts), MU (2025 Q4 – 2025 Q4, +7.1 pts), COR (2022 Q4 – 2025 Q4, +5.6 pts) .

Strategy ann.: 8.3% SPY ann.: 10.7% Period: 2007–2026
Best Recent Contributors — Last 5Y
1 of 5 recent top contributors lagged SPY, which means even some of this fund's best return drivers still failed to beat a simple index over the same window.
2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4 • 19Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
JPM
+89%
SPY
+77%
Contrib
+11.2%
2021 Q2 – 2025 Q3 • 18Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
AZO
+137%
SPY
+63%
Contrib
+10.6%
2021 Q2 – 2022 Q3 • 6Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
COP
+97%
SPY
+-6%
Contrib
+7.8%
2025 Q4 – 2025 Q4 • 1Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
MU
+89%
SPY
+9%
Contrib
+7.1%
2022 Q4 – 2025 Q4 • 13Q in Top 10 Lagged SPY
COR
+68%
SPY
+88%
Contrib
+5.6%
Stock return (green = beat SPY)   Stock return (red = lagged SPY)   SPY same period   Cumulative contribution during the last 5 years of the quarterly Mn-weighted Top 10 strategy

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Boston Partners invest in?
Boston Partners employs a disciplined value investment philosophy enhanced by quantitative screens for quality and positive business momentum, creating what the firm describes as a "value with a catalyst" approach distinguishing it from traditional deep-value or distressed investing. The firm's **13F Portfolio Composition** reflects diversified exposure to companies exhibiting attractive valuation characteristics measured through price-to-earnings, price-to-book, price-to-cash-flow, and enterprise-value-to-EBITDA metrics, combined with quality factors including strong balance sheets, sustainable competitive advantages, consistent profitability, and positive free cash flow generation. Unlike pure quantitative value strategies mechanically buying lowest-multiple stocks, Boston Partners integrates fundamental research to assess business quality, competitive positioning, management capability, and earnings sustainability, seeking to avoid value traps where low valuations reflect deteriorating business fundamentals rather than temporary market pessimism. The investment process begins with quantitative screening across broad equity universes to identify securities meeting valuation, quality, and momentum criteria, followed by fundamental analysis validating investment theses, assessing downside risks, and confirming that attractive valuations reflect temporary dislocations rather than permanent business impairment. **Sector Allocation History** demonstrates the firm's willingness to maintain meaningful sector weights different from broad market indices, with value orientation naturally creating overweights in financials, energy, industrials, and materials sectors that typically trade at lower multiples while underweighting expensive growth sectors like technology and consumer discretionary, though exposures shift dynamically as relative valuations change across market cycles. Portfolio construction emphasizes diversification across 50-100 positions depending on mandate size and strategy focus, with position sizing reflecting conviction levels, risk contribution analysis, and portfolio optimization balancing expected returns against volatility and drawdown objectives. The momentum overlay represents a critical differentiating factor, with Boston Partners seeking positive earnings revisions, improving operational trends, and constructive technical patterns that provide catalysts for value realization rather than simply buying cheap stocks and waiting indefinitely for market recognition. This "value with momentum" combination theoretically avoids both the extreme volatility of pure momentum strategies that chase expensive high-growth stocks and the prolonged underperformance periods afflicting deep-value approaches buying deteriorating businesses at bargain prices. The firm's market capitalization flexibility enables opportunity pursuit across large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap segments, with different strategies focusing on specific size ranges while maintaining consistent value-quality-momentum discipline across all capitalizations.
What is Boston Partners's AUM?
Boston Partners reported $95.47B in 13F assets as of 2026 Q1. Note: 13F AUM reflects only long equity positions reported to the SEC and may differ from total assets under management.
How concentrated is Boston Partners's portfolio?
Boston Partners holds 767 disclosed positions. The top 10 holdings represent +13.57% of the reported portfolio, indicating a diversified investment approach.
How to track Boston Partners 13F filings?
Track Boston Partners's quarterly filings on SEC EDGAR or on this page — data is updated within days of each filing deadline. Subscribe to 13Foresight for position-change alerts.
Who manages Boston Partners?
Boston Partners is managed by Joseph Feeney (Chief Executive Officer), Christopher Hart (Chief Investment Officer, Large Cap Value), Gregory Dulski (Portfolio Manager).

Disclaimer: 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. All information on this site is provided solely for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Portfolio backtests shown on this page are hypothetical and simulated — they do not represent actual trading results and were constructed with the benefit of hindsight. Actual results would differ materially. 13F filings disclose only long equity positions valued above $10,000, submitted up to 45 days after quarter-end; they do not capture short positions, options, bonds, cash, private investments, or non-U.S. securities. A fund's backtest performance may not reflect its actual returns, as managers frequently generate alpha through strategies not visible in 13F data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All data sourced from public SEC EDGAR filings. Use at your own risk. Full Terms of Use.

Full history →