Global Asset Manager / Investment Advisory Firm

LAZARD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC — 13F Portfolio

New York, NY SEC Registered Investment Advisor Institutional CIK: 0001207017
13F Score ?
15
3Y · Top 10 · Mgr Wt
13F Score ?
17
7Y · Top 10 · Mgr Wt
S&P 500 ?
80
Benchmark
$60.78B
AUM
+0.00%
2026 Q1
+31.81%
1-Year Return
+23.06%
Top 10 Concentration
+10.80%
Turnover
+2.99%
AUM Change
Since 2003
First Filing
1856
# of Holdings

Fund Overview

13F Filed: 2026-05-15

As of 2026 Q1, Lazard Asset Management Llc manages $60.78B in reported 13F assets , holds 1856 positions with +23.06% top-10 concentration , and delivered a 1-year return of +31.81% on its disclosed equity portfolio. Filing 13F reports since 2003. View full holdings list →

About

Investment Strategy

Analytics Summary

Risk Profile

Key Personnel

Evan L. Russo — Global Chief Investment Officer
Ashish Shah — Chief Investment Officer, Public Investments
Ronald Temple — Chief Market Strategist and Head of U.S. Equity
Michael Bennett — Chief Investment Officer, Multi-Asset
Official 13F Filings — SEC EDGAR Key personnel and Fund Overview may contain mistakes

Activity Summary — 2026 Q1

Q1 2026 13F Filed: May 15, 2026

Top Buys

% $
Stock % Impact
+0.71%
+0.41%
+0.38%
+0.35%
+0.33%
+0.32%

Top Sells

% $
Stock % Impact
-0.69%
-0.30%
-0.26%
-0.23%
Sold All 😨 Was: 0.21% -0.20%
Sold All 😨 Was: 0.20% -0.19%

Top Holdings

2026 Q1
Stock %
3.44%
3.23%
2.96%
2.64%
2.08%
1.99%
View All Holdings

Activity Summary

Latest
Market Value $60.78B
AUM Change +2.99%
New Positions 287
Increased Positions 831
Closed Positions 275
Top 10 Concentration +23.06%
Portfolio Turnover +10.80%
Alt Turnover +12.28%

Sector Allocation Trends

Quarterly History
Free View: Last 10 Quarters. Subscribe to see full history

Holdings Analysis

Size: % of Portfolio Color: Last Full-Quarter Return No data
Free: 10 quarters

Positions Dynamics

Visualizing Top 20 holdings weight history over the last 10 quarters.

Portfolio Analytics — Latest

LAZARD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC risk dashboard covering volatility, beta, value-at-risk, drawdowns, concentration, factor tilts, benchmark comparison, and stress testing for the latest disclosed portfolio.

Risk access
Building institutional risk profile...
Guru Intelligence Hub Pro
Real-time Analytics
High-Conviction Alpha
AAPL 92.4
NVDA 88.1
MSFT 74.3
Strategy Guardian
Style Drift 0.12
Sector Rotation 0.38

Tracking institutional benchmark deviation

Scenario Lab
2008 GFC -32.4%
Covid-19 -18.1%
2022 Bear -24.7%
Unlock the full Guru Intelligence Hub
Real conviction scores for every holding  ·  Strategy Guardian alerts  ·  Live Scenario Lab stress tests
Upgrade to Pro

Best Strategy vs. Benchmarks

AI Backtest: Auto-Optimizing...
Loading AI Backtest...
Don't be Fooled by Randomness
Access Alpha, Capture Ratios, and Batting Average calibrated for this specific strategy.
UPGRADE NOW
Nassim Taleb — author of Fooled by Randomness
Returns
--
Latest Quarter
--
1-Year Return
--
Ann. Return
Risk
--
Std Deviation
--
Max Drawdown
--
Beta vs SPY
Quality
--
Sharpe
--
Sortino
--
Win Rate
--
Payoff Ratio
Edge Metrics Last 10 quarters only
--
Alpha annualized
--
Up Capture
--
Down Capture

Strategy Backtester: LAZARD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC

Replicate top holdings performance • Compare vs benchmarks • Optimize N

Find the best N! Test multiple portfolio sizes at once to discover the optimal configuration.

Risk insights! Identify periods when the fund lagged the benchmark – critical for timing entries.

⏱ Run Backtest

Liquid Glass Edition

0
Backtests Run
+127%
Avg. Return

👆 Click the button to launch tickers!

Don't Be Fooled by Randomness
Proven alpha spans cycles, not just 24 months. Unlock full history since 1999.
PRO ACCESS
Free Demo
Try the Backtester on Real Funds
Run full-history backtests on a curated 2-3 funds. See signal quality, drawdowns, and cycle behavior before you decide.
Underperformance Analysis — Top 10 Holdings vs SPY

Backtesting LAZARD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC's top 10 holdings against SPY identified 72 underperformance periods. Worst drawdown: 2011-12 – 2012-03 (-11.5% vs SPY, 4 quarters).

Avg. lag: -4.0% vs SPY Avg. duration: 2.0 quarters
Backtest Snapshot — Top 10 Holdings (Mn-Weighted)

The ticker-level breakdown shows how each of LAZARD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC's top holdings contributed to portfolio returns quarter by quarter. Strongest recent contributors inside the last 5 years of the quarterly Top 10 backtest window: GOOGL (2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4, +12.6 pts), AMZN (2021 Q3 – 2025 Q4, +9.6 pts), MSFT (2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4, +8.7 pts), AAPL (2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4, +6.3 pts), TSM (2025 Q2 – 2025 Q4, +3.9 pts) .

Strategy ann.: 10.1% SPY ann.: 11.4% Period: 2003–2026
Best Recent Contributors — Last 5Y
2 of 5 recent top contributors lagged SPY, which means even some of this fund's best return drivers still failed to beat a simple index over the same window.
2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4 • 19Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
GOOGL
+189%
SPY
+74%
Contrib
+12.6%
2021 Q3 – 2025 Q4 • 18Q in Top 10 Lagged SPY
AMZN
+49%
SPY
+65%
Contrib
+9.6%
2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4 • 19Q in Top 10 Lagged SPY
MSFT
+45%
SPY
+74%
Contrib
+8.7%
2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4 • 9Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
AAPL
+61%
SPY
+50%
Contrib
+6.3%
2025 Q2 – 2025 Q4 • 3Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
TSM
+70%
SPY
+13%
Contrib
+3.9%
Stock return (green = beat SPY)   Stock return (red = lagged SPY)   SPY same period   Cumulative contribution during the last 5 years of the quarterly Mn-weighted Top 10 strategy

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Lazard Asset Management Llc invest in?
Lazard Asset Management employs fundamental value investing emphasizing business quality, financial strength, and attractive valuations, seeking securities trading below estimates of intrinsic value with catalysts for price appreciation over multi-year horizons. The investment philosophy centers on rigorous bottom-up research identifying undervalued companies with strong balance sheets, sustainable competitive advantages, capable management teams, and favorable industry structures. Portfolio managers and analysts conduct extensive due diligence including management meetings, competitive analysis, financial modeling, and proprietary research to develop conviction in business quality and valuation assessments. This research intensity supports concentrated portfolios reflecting highest-conviction ideas rather than index-hugging diversification, with willingness to maintain significant active weights when fundamental analysis supports differentiated positioning. The **13F Portfolio Composition** reveals value-oriented characteristics including lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios than growth-focused managers, emphasis on free cash flow generation and dividend sustainability, and sector allocations reflecting bottom-up opportunity identification rather than benchmark replication. Financials receive meaningful attention given Lazard's specialized expertise analyzing banks, insurers, and asset managers through decades of industry involvement. Energy and materials positions appear when commodity cycles create valuation opportunities in quality producers trading below replacement cost or normalized earnings. Technology and healthcare holdings reflect selective identification of established businesses with recurring revenue, strong balance sheets, and reasonable valuations despite market preference for higher-multiple growth names. Consumer and industrial positions emphasize market leaders with pricing power and operational efficiency trading at discounts to intrinsic value. Portfolio construction balances conviction weighting in highest-quality undervalued businesses with diversification managing idiosyncratic risks and ensuring appropriate geographic, sector, and currency exposures. The **Top 10 Holdings Concentration** typically represents meaningful but not extreme portfolio weight, reflecting value discipline and comfort maintaining differentiated positions while recognizing uncertainty inherent in individual security outcomes. Lazard's patient investment horizon enables holding periods extending years as business fundamentals compound and market recognition narrows valuation gaps, accepting interim volatility when underlying business strength remains intact. This low-turnover orientation reduces transaction costs, enhances tax efficiency, and allows value realization timeframes extending beyond quarterly or annual measurement periods common in performance-focused institutional mandates. The firm's global investment platform enables cross-border valuation comparisons, identifying attractive relative value opportunities where similar business quality commands different valuations across markets due to investor preferences, liquidity differences, or regulatory factors. This global perspective informs U.S. equity selection, with analysts comparing American businesses to international competitors to assess competitive positioning and valuation reasonableness. Currency analysis influences positioning in multinational businesses with significant foreign operations, evaluating both translation impacts on reported earnings and economic exposures affecting business competitiveness. **Sector Allocation History** demonstrates Lazard's contrarian willingness to overweight out-of-favor sectors when valuations compensate for near-term challenges, diverging from momentum-driven approaches chasing recent winners. Lazard's investment process incorporates ESG integration as component of fundamental analysis, evaluating environmental risks, social factors, and governance quality as material inputs affecting long-term value creation and business sustainability. The firm offers dedicated ESG-focused strategies applying explicit screens alongside traditional mandates integrating sustainability considerations into holistic business quality assessment. This approach views strong governance, environmental stewardship, and social responsibility as indicators of superior management quality and risk mitigation rather than merely ethical considerations, aligning ESG integration with fundamental value investing philosophy. The research culture emphasizes independent thinking and willingness to challenge consensus views, seeking opportunities where market participants underappreciate business quality, overestimate risks, or extrapolate temporary headwinds into permanent impairment.
What is Lazard Asset Management Llc's AUM?
Lazard Asset Management Llc reported $60.78B in 13F assets as of 2026 Q1. Note: 13F AUM reflects only long equity positions reported to the SEC and may differ from total assets under management.
How concentrated is Lazard Asset Management Llc's portfolio?
Lazard Asset Management Llc holds 1856 disclosed positions. The top 10 holdings represent +23.06% of the reported portfolio, indicating a diversified investment approach.
How to track Lazard Asset Management Llc 13F filings?
Track Lazard Asset Management Llc's quarterly filings on SEC EDGAR or on this page — data is updated within days of each filing deadline. Subscribe to 13Foresight for position-change alerts.
Who manages Lazard Asset Management Llc?
Lazard Asset Management Llc is managed by Evan L. Russo (Global Chief Investment Officer), Ashish Shah (Chief Investment Officer, Public Investments), Ronald Temple (Chief Market Strategist and Head of U.S. Equity), Michael Bennett (Chief Investment Officer, Multi-Asset).

Disclaimer: 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. All information on this site is provided solely for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Portfolio backtests shown on this page are hypothetical and simulated — they do not represent actual trading results and were constructed with the benefit of hindsight. Actual results would differ materially. 13F filings disclose only long equity positions valued above $10,000, submitted up to 45 days after quarter-end; they do not capture short positions, options, bonds, cash, private investments, or non-U.S. securities. A fund's backtest performance may not reflect its actual returns, as managers frequently generate alpha through strategies not visible in 13F data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All data sourced from public SEC EDGAR filings. Use at your own risk. Full Terms of Use.

Full history →